<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mainframe COBOL &#187; expensive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mainframecobol.info/tag/expensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info</link>
	<description>We know what COBOL stands for</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Linux&#8230;Ten Years On the Mainframe!</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2010/03/linuxten-years-on-the-mainframe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2010/03/linuxten-years-on-the-mainframe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expensive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mainframes are about 40 years old. And as you probably know, several years ago mainframes were written off as expensive, dated computers that were capable of running only large business applications. Mainframe go south, many said. Not anymore &#8211; thanks to Linux! Linux on mainframes has evolved rapidly during the past 10 years &#8211; yes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mainframes are about 40 years old. And as you probably know, several years ago mainframes were written off as expensive, dated computers that were capable of running only large business applications. Mainframe go south, many said. Not anymore &#8211; thanks to Linux!</p>
<p>Linux on mainframes has evolved rapidly during the past 10 years &#8211; yes &#8211; 2010 is the 10th anniversary of Linux on the mainframe. <a href="http://www.novell.com/communities/node/10010/ten-years-mainframe">READ MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2010/03/linuxten-years-on-the-mainframe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Myth Of The Expensive Mainframe</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2010/02/the-myth-of-the-expensive-mainframe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2010/02/the-myth-of-the-expensive-mainframe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expensive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mainframes are expensive, aren’t they? Well, that’s a piece of accepted wisdom I’ve never really bought into. I think that mainframes are a remarkably cheap platform, if they are properly managed, partly because getting 80% plus utilisation of a mainframe processor and the electricity it eats isn’t hard. READ MORE]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mainframes are expensive, aren’t they? Well, that’s a piece of accepted wisdom I’ve never really bought into. I think that mainframes are a remarkably cheap platform, if they are properly managed, partly because getting 80% plus utilisation of a mainframe processor and the electricity it eats isn’t hard.  <a href="http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=3978">READ MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2010/02/the-myth-of-the-expensive-mainframe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

