<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mainframe COBOL &#187; computer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mainframecobol.info/tag/computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info</link>
	<description>We know what COBOL stands for</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Linux divisions</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2012/02/linux-divisions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2012/02/linux-divisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arcati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linus torvalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainframe Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ndash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vocabulary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Data Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yearbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=1167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Linus Torvalds released Linux on 5 October 1991, and by 1998 IBM was experimenting with it. In 2000 it was properly available on mainframes &#8211; along with the specialty processor IFL (Integrated Facility for Linux). The rest, as they say, is history. As well as mainframes, Linux, of course, runs on desktops and servers. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linus Torvalds released Linux on 5 October 1991, and by 1998 IBM was experimenting with it. In 2000 it was properly available on mainframes &ndash; along with the specialty processor IFL (Integrated Facility for Linux). The rest, as they say, is history.</p>
<p><span id="more-1167"></span></p>
<p>As well as mainframes, Linux, of course, runs on desktops and servers. The Mac OS is based on Unix, but Android &ndash; found on millions of smartphones and tablets &ndash; is based on Linux.</p>
<p>So what divisions am I talking about? The division between big iron and little? Well not really. In fact, interestingly, the people at William Data Systems have come out with a way of monitoring Linux whether it&rsquo;s on a mainframe or server somewhere else in the world. As long as it has an IP address, they have a way of monitoring it (using z/OS as the hub).</p>
<p>No, the first division I want to look at is the division between the USA (or North America, I should say) and Europe. The recent Arcati Mainframe Yearbook user survey (still freely available at <a href="http://www.arcati.com/newyearbook12" target="_blank" title="Arcati Mainframe Yearbook">www.arcati.com/newyearbook12</a>) came up with some interesting results. The survey found that&nbsp; 70% of European sites surveyed didn&#8217;t have Linux, whereas only 28% of North American sites in the surveyed didn&rsquo;t. That&rsquo;s a huge difference. And if you were IBM, you might well be wondering why Linux isn&rsquo;t selling into Europe so well as North America. </p>
<p>Let&rsquo;s speculate. Is it that North America is well ahead of the curve in terms of take up of mainframe Linux? Is it that mainframe Linux is priced differently either side of the pond so it encourages the take up in the USA but not Europe? Or could it be that IFLs are marked up or down depending on whether the customer is EMEA-based or not? Are IFLs being bundled in with upgrades or not depending on where in the world you&rsquo;re based? I have recently had some nudges and winks over prices, and it could well be that European mainframe users are being charged double what their US-based counterpart might expect to pay. I&rsquo;d be interested to hear what figure people, who&rsquo;ve recently negotiated with IBM, have haggled them down to. You might also wonder whether now is a good time to buy shares in SuSE, who have about an 80% share of the mainframe Linux market. Will we see it suddenly explode in Europe? Or not?</p>
<p>The other division that&rsquo;s recently cropped up with Linux is how users navigate. I guess we&rsquo;re all pretty much familiar with using drop-down menus to access what we want &ndash; and we can probably use them to find our way around familiar applications without even thinking about it. Even very young childen take to that way of navigating like it was second nature. But just recently we&rsquo;ve seen the introduction of Heads Up Displays (HUDs) for Ubuntu&rsquo;s Linux.</p>
<p>What you get is a sort of semi-transparent area at the top of the screen, which acts in some ways like the ribbon with Office. HUD provides a search style interface that uses a Vocabulary User Interface (VUI). Users start to type or say a command, and the HUD starts a smart look-ahead search through the application and system (indicator) menus. By combining fuzzy matching with a learning function, the HUD begins to &lsquo;recognize&rsquo; the actions of each individual user.</p>
<p>If you want to give it a go, HUD will be available in Ubuntu 12.04 towards the end of April.</p>
<p>Now I&rsquo;m guessing that, like Microsoft&rsquo;s ribbon, and Marmite, users will either love it or hate it. The idea that it will use voice indicates to me that we&rsquo;re back to the original Star Trek computer idea &ndash; a computer that you can talk to. This was an idea that went away for a while because, to be honest, voice reconition software just wasn&rsquo;t up to the job. But now we&rsquo;ve had Siri on iPhones for a while, and people are coming back to the idea that talking to a computer isn&rsquo;t such a silly idea after all.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve only spoken to one person who&rsquo;s used the HUD and he was singing its praises. But he is very familiar with Linux and the Ubuntu distro, so maybe he had a clearer idea of what to ask the HUD to do for him &ndash; in terms of getting any work done &ndash; than, for example, I might have.</p>
<p>Perhaps one day we&rsquo;ll see a HUD on mainframe Linux. And perhaps we&rsquo;ll see more mainframe Linux sites in Europe, Middle East, and Africa. Or will the divisions continue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2012/02/linux-divisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgian student masters the IBM mainframe</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2012/02/georgian-student-masters-the-ibm-mainframe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2012/02/georgian-student-masters-the-ibm-mainframe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgian College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ibm Mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Voth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student masters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=1165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Georgian College computer programming student is a master of the mainframe. At least that’s what IBM is saying, as second-year student Nathan Voth placed second in IBM’s Master the Mainframe contest. Read more&#8230; [Simcoe.Com]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Georgian College computer programming student is a master of the mainframe.</p>
<p>At least that’s what IBM is saying, as second-year student Nathan Voth placed second in IBM’s Master the Mainframe contest.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simcoe.com/news/article/1288919--georgian-student-masters-the-ibm-mainframe">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.simcoe.com/news/article/1288919--georgian-student-masters-the-ibm-mainframe">Simcoe.Com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2012/02/georgian-student-masters-the-ibm-mainframe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COBOL, The Computer Language that Refused to Die</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/11/cobol-the-computer-language-that-refused-to-die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/11/cobol-the-computer-language-that-refused-to-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cobol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[axioms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software engineers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=1114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a tendency to think that with technology everything old is swept aside by the new. But behind every shiny toy is one of the most powerful axioms of engineering: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” Once established, computer languages tend to fit that model. It is not simply that they have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a tendency to think that with technology everything old is swept aside by the new. But behind every shiny toy is one of the most powerful axioms of engineering: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”</p>
<p>Once established, computer languages tend to fit that model. It is not simply that they have been used to create applications which continue to work, the software engineers’ coding skills do not disappear instantly either. Although there cannot be many around who were in at the genesis of Cobol in 1959.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/comment/who-still-cares-about-cobol-45945">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/11/cobol-the-computer-language-that-refused-to-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCarthy, 84, Dies; Computer Design Pioneer</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/10/john-mccarthy-84-dies-computer-design-pioneer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/10/john-mccarthy-84-dies-computer-design-pioneer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications of heart disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john mccarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainframe Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pioneer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah mccarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John McCarthy, a computer scientist who helped design the foundation of today’s Internet-based computing and who is widely credited with coining the term for a frontier of research he helped pioneer, Artificial Intelligence, or A.I., died on Monday at his home in Stanford, Calif. He was 84. The cause was complications of heart disease, his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="margin-right: 10px;" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2011/10/26/business/MCCARTHY-obit/MCCARTHY-obit-articleInline.jpg" alt="" width="190" height="275" /> John McCarthy, a computer scientist who helped design the foundation of today’s Internet-based computing and who is widely credited with coining the term for a frontier of research he helped pioneer, Artificial Intelligence, or A.I., died on Monday at his home in Stanford, Calif. He was 84.</p>
<p>The cause was complications of heart disease, his daughter Sarah McCarthy said.</p>
<p>McCarthy was instrumental in developing the first time-sharing system for mainframe computers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/science/26mccarthy.html?_r=1">More&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/10/john-mccarthy-84-dies-computer-design-pioneer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Allen Wants Your Legacy Hardware</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/08/paul-allen-wants-your-legacy-hardware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/08/paul-allen-wants-your-legacy-hardware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legacy hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwii fighter planes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Allen, Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;Idea Man,&#8221; is an aficionado of relic computing devices—the older and more obscure, the better. He collects them, along with rare WWII fighter planes, and shares this passion at his Living Computer Museum in Seattle. Read more at Gizmodo&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5834245/paul-allen-wants-your-legacy-hardware"> <img class="alignleft" style="margin-right: 10px;" src="http://fastcache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2011/08/medium_169_kl10top.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="169" /></a>Paul Allen, Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;Idea Man,&#8221; is an aficionado of relic computing devices—the older and more obscure, the better. He collects them, along with <a href="http://www.paulallen.com/Template.aspx?contentId=24">rare WWII fighter planes</a>, and shares this passion at his Living Computer Museum in Seattle.</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5834245/paul-allen-wants-your-legacy-hardware">Read more at Gizmodo&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/08/paul-allen-wants-your-legacy-hardware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The PC at 30</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/08/the-pc-at-30/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/08/the-pc-at-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Eddolls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cobol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5150]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boca raton florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control program for microcomputers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CP/M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary kildall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lsquo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seattle computer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sinclair Spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waldorf astoria new york]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=1062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the future, IBM will be known as the PC maker of choice for most people, and those PCs will be running a GUI (Graphical User Interface) based on CP/M. Well, that was the view of some people 30 years ago when IBM gave birth to its first PC. It was on 12 August in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the future, IBM will be known as the PC maker of choice for most people, and those PCs will be running a GUI (Graphical User Interface) based on CP/M. Well, that was the view of some people 30 years ago when IBM gave birth to its first PC.</p>
<p>It was on 12 August in a ballroom at the Waldorf Astoria, New York that the IBM 5150 made its first appearance. And because IBM was known for making mainframes, this device was called a &lsquo;personal computer&rsquo;.</p>
<p><span id="more-1062"></span></p>
<p>IBM didn&rsquo;t invent the idea of small personal computers, they just wanted a part of a new and growing market place. In those days you could buy small computers like the Sinclair Spectrum, and slighty bigger boxes from Apple, Atari, Commodore, Osborne, and Tandy. The big mind-shift for the IBM engineers in Boca Raton, Florida, was to construct their PC from parts that were available off-the-shelf. Up until then, IBM had always designed and made what they needed. However, time was precious and development was faster by shopping to get the parts. It was a decision that allowed clone makers a foot in the door.</p>
<p>IBM wrote the BIOS (Basic Input/Output System), the part that&rsquo;s loaded when the machine boots up. Next they needed an operating system. In the same way they were buying hardware components, they thought they&rsquo;d buy the OS. The best one around was CP/M (Control Program for Microcomputers) from Gary Kildall of Digital Research, Inc. The story goes that IBM&rsquo;s representatives waited to see him but he didn&rsquo;t want to deal with men in suits. Remember back then how &lsquo;cool&rsquo; computing was. As a consequence, IBM looked for another source for the operating system. They found Bill Gates. He provided PC-DOS, which was a rewrite of Seattle Computer Products&rsquo; (SCP) 86-DOS. The rest, as they say, is history.</p>
<p>Because the 5150 was made from these off-the-shelf component, other companies were quick to copy it. These clone makers badged their machines as IBM compatible. It seems a while since anyone put one of those stickers on a PC! However, because they couldn&rsquo;t copy the IBM BIOS, they were never 100% compatible in those days. Now, of course, it&rsquo;s not an issue. And many companies have come on the scene, made a lot of money making PCs, and disappeared again. </p>
<p>The first PC came standard with 16 kilobytes of memory, upgradeable to 64K, two 5.25-inch floppy drives, an Intel 8088 processor running at 4.77MHz, a display/printer adapter card, and a 12-inch green CRT monitor. You could then buy IBM&rsquo;s dot-matrix printer and the necessary cable. This meant you&rsquo;d be looking at over $3000 for the whole lot!</p>
<p>And now, IBM doesn&rsquo;t have a PC business. It sold it to Lenovo in 2004. In 1996, Caldera acquired the assets of Digital Research from Novell, and later changed its own name to The SCO Group, and more recently the TSG Group.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s always hard predicting the future, even if you invented it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/08/the-pc-at-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behind the Youthful Sales Surge for IBM Mainframes</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/07/behind-the-youthful-sales-surge-for-ibm-mainframes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/07/behind-the-youthful-sales-surge-for-ibm-mainframes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm mainframes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venerable computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just how hot is IBM’s most venerable computer line? Well, revenue from the high-end machines known as mainframes surged 61% in the second quarter, capping the best four quarters of growth for the segment in five years. Not bad for a product that has repeatedly been written off as dead or outdated, as most computing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just how hot is IBM’s most venerable computer line? Well, revenue from the high-end machines known as mainframes surged 61% in the second quarter, capping the best four quarters of growth for the segment in five years.</p>
<p>Not bad for a product that has repeatedly been written off as dead or outdated, as most computing chores shift to lower-priced servers that descended from personal computers.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/07/28/behind-the-youthful-sales-surge-for-ibm-mainframes/">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/07/behind-the-youthful-sales-surge-for-ibm-mainframes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM Debuts Lower Cost $75,000 Mainframe</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/07/ibm-debuts-lower-cost-75000-mainframe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/07/ibm-debuts-lower-cost-75000-mainframe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 23:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blade server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainframe Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainframe Ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed connections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=1004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New zEnterprise System model links apps on blades to data on the mainframe. IBM is introducing a mainframe computer to its zEnterprise System lineup that costs 25% less than the previous model, but still offers high-speed connections between the mainframe&#8217;s data and an attached blade server hosting an application that needs that data. An industry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New zEnterprise System model links apps on blades to data on the mainframe.</strong></p>
<p>IBM is introducing a mainframe computer to its zEnterprise System lineup that costs 25% less than the previous model, but still offers high-speed connections between the mainframe&#8217;s data and an attached blade server hosting an application that needs that data. An industry analyst says the new mainframe serves a growing industry trend for IT vendors to better optimize system performance and offer more affordable IT that is accessible for a wider array of customers.</p>
<p>The IBM zEnterprise 114, announced Tuesday, is a follow-up to the <a href="http://informationweek.com/news/hardware/supercomputers/226200076">zEnterprise 196</a> mainframe introduced in July 2010.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/data_centers/231001389">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/07/ibm-debuts-lower-cost-75000-mainframe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who invented the personal computer? (hint: not IBM)</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/06/who-invented-the-personal-computer-hint-not-ibm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/06/who-invented-the-personal-computer-hint-not-ibm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birthday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business machines corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer hint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international business machines corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video lecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The International Business Machines corporation is celebrating its 100th birthday this year. And to do so, the company has released a video lecture of its history that contains at least one very contestable assertion—that IBM gets credit for the personal computer. Read more&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The International Business Machines corporation is celebrating its 100th birthday this year. And to do so, the company has released a video lecture of its history that contains at least one very contestable assertion—that IBM gets credit for the personal computer.</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/06/did-ibm-invent-the-personal-computer-answer-no.ars">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/06/who-invented-the-personal-computer-hint-not-ibm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM:  C</title>
		<link>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/06/ibm-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/06/ibm-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Eddolls</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cobol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birthday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bundy manufacturing company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[db2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international time recording company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Akers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lexmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Gerstner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ndash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smarter planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System/360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabulating machine company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas j watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas J Watson Sr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Watson Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zEnterprise 196]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zLinux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainframecobol.info/?p=975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IBM celebrating its 100th birthday makes you think you should write its age in Roman numerals &#8211; which is what I did in the title. How does a venerable old organization avoid being put out to grass and stay ahead of the business game? How does it become synonymous with cloud computing, smarter planet, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM celebrating its 100th birthday makes you think you should write its age in Roman numerals &ndash; which is what I did in the title. How does a venerable old organization avoid being put out to grass and stay ahead of the business game? How does it become synonymous with cloud computing, smarter planet, and data analytics? I guess the answer is by completely re-inventing itself.</p>
<p><span id="more-975"></span></p>
<p>The truth is that IBM is not the controlling influence it once was, but that&rsquo;s a good thing. No longer does it decide what customers want and try to sell it &ndash; it now listens to its customers. Another good thing.</p>
<p>In the 1970s, IBM was the king of computing with the combined revenues of the BUNCH significantly less its own. The BUNCH were Burroughs (still around as UNISYS), UNIVAC (still around as UNISYS), NCR (which was acquired by AT&amp;T for a time and eventually sold its computer manfacturing business to Solectron), Control Data Corporation (now called Syntegra), and Honeywell (whose computer division became part of Groupe Bull). </p>
<p>During its lifetime, we&rsquo;ve seen the birth of Hewlett-Packard (72-years-old), Intel (43-years-old), Apple (35-years-old), Google (12-years-old), Facebook (7-years-old), and other companies that have become kings of their not-so-small niches.</p>
<p>IBM itself was (obviously as we&rsquo;re celebrating 100 years) founded in 1911, but was then called the Computing Tabulating Recording Corporation. It originated with the merger of four companies: the Tabulating Machine Company, the International Time Recording Company, the Computing Scale Corporation, and the Bundy Manufacturing Company. The name International Business Machines didn&rsquo;t arrive until 1924 (so more partying in 13 years time!). Bundy Manufacturing first appeared in 1889. The Tabulating Machine Company arrived in 1896.</p>
<p>The famous Thomas J Watson Sr joined the company in 1914 and soon became president. In 1956: Tom Watson Jr took over as CEO. Through the 1960 we get the System/360, VM, IMS, CICS, and many other things that we&rsquo;re still familiar with today. In 1981 IBM invented the Personal Computer. </p>
<p>The early 1990s were a bad time as IBM announced its first loss. CEO John Akers talked about breaking up IBM into smaller companies that could compete better. In 1993, Lou Gerstner took over the reigns and things started to improve. In 1995 IBM acquired Lotus and its Notes software. 1995 also saw the launch of the much-admired ThinkPad laptop computer. And 1996 gave us DB2.</p>
<p>But over time, IBM has moved away from opportunities. It sold off its Lexmark printing business in 1991. It sold its networking business to Cisco in 1999. And it sold its PC business to Chinese-based Lenovo in 2005. But it&rsquo;s still a big company, In 2011, Fortune ranked it as the 18th largest in the USA, and the 7th most profitable. Forbes ranked it as the 31st largest in the world. And it has thousands of patents under its belt.</p>
<p>The zEnterprise 196 hardware shows that IBM is planning for a long future. It allows all the good things about mainframes to be spread across other platforms. Plus, people are slowly grasping the amazing things they can achieve with zLinux on mainframes. Big Iron isn&rsquo;t rusting away!</p>
<p>And IBM always had a fun side (honest!). In 1997 the Deep Blue computer defeated chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov at chess. And in 2011 a computer called Watson won the Jeopardy game show.</p>
<p>Happy birthday Big Blue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mainframecobol.info/2011/06/ibm-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

